Incorrectly Filed
Plaintiff: SCOTT ARLEN TERRY
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 4:2020cv03582
Filed: October 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2020 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by SCOTT ARLEN TERRY, filed.(Osterhout, Karl)
October 20, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Karl Osterhout to Appear Pro Hac Vice by SCOTT ARLEN TERRY, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/10/2020. (Osterhout, Karl)
October 20, 2020 Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by SCOTT ARLEN TERRY. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Complaint, #4 Proposed Summons)(Osterhout, Karl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Incorrectly Filed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SCOTT ARLEN TERRY
Represented By: Karl E Osterhout
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?