Padilla v. Big G Express, Inc et al
| Rolando Padilla |
| Big G Express, Inc and Jeremy Dye |
| 4:2020cv03595 |
| October 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Andrew S Hanen |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Big G Express, Inc, Jeremy Dye, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/28/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Proposed Order)(Helmey, David) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Big G Express, Inc, Jeremy Dye, filed.(Helmey, David) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 State Court Petition/Notice of Removal with Jury Demand by Big G Express, Inc, Jeremy Dye, filed.(Helmey, David) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 4/14/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 704 before Magistrate Judge Frances H Stacy. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(JacquelineMataadi, 4)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 152nd Harris County Judicial District, case number 2020-52402 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-25383260) filed by Jeremy Dye, Big G Express, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F)(Helmey, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
