Terry v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
| Martin Dewayne Terry and Marvin Dewayne Terry |
| Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID |
| 4:2020cv03669 |
| October 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Andrew S Hanen |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER denying #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.(Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(LaurenWebster, 4)
|
| Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Marvin Dewayne Terry, filed. (DawnWaggoner, 4) |
| Filing 5 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Marvin Dewayne Terry, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/27/2020. (DawnWaggoner, 4) |
| Filing 4 FINAL JUDGMENT. Case terminated on 11/4/2020(Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(jdav, 4) |
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The habeas corpus petition is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(jdav, 4)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (ckrus, 4) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Marvin Dewayne Terry.(ckrus, 4) Modified on 11/3/2020 (bgoolsby, 4). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
