Posey v. Netters
Michael E Posey |
Linda Netters and United States of America (IRS) |
4:2020cv03845 |
November 12, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Sim Lake |
Taxes |
26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 IRS: Tax Liability |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER OF DISMISSAL on #14 Notice of Settlement. This action is dismissed without prejudice. Case terminated on 1/12/2021. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Settlement by United States of America (IRS), filed. (Miller, Glen) |
Filing 13 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 3/5/2021 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 9B before Judge Sim Lake. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time for Filing an Answer (Answer due by 1/11/2021.) (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4) |
Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time for Filing an Answer by United States of America (IRS), filed. Motion Docket Date 12/8/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Miller, Glen) |
Filing 10 Case transferred in from Texas Eastern. Case Number 6:20-cv-00457; certified copy of transfer order, certified docket sheet, and transfer letter received |
Filing 9 ORDER that the United States' motion to dismiss or alternatively transfer #7 is GRANTED as set forth herein. This case is TRANSFERRED to the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, for all future proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 11/10/20. (mll, ) |
Interdistrict transfer to the Southern District of Texas Houston Division. (mll, ) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3) filed by Michael E Posey. (gsg) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3) by United States of America (IRS). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Miller, Glen) |
Filing 6 Return of Service Executed as to Linda Netters on 8/26/2020, by cert mail. (mll, ) |
Filing 5 Return of Service Executed as to Linda Netters on 9/9/2020, by certified mail on US Attorney General, Washington, DC. (mll, ) |
Filing 4 Return of Service Executed as to Linda Netters on 8/25/2020, by certified mail on US Attorney, Tyler, TX; answer due: 10/26/2020. (mll, ) |
Filing 3 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge John D Love. (mll, ) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Linda Netters, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General, and handed to plaintiff pro se w/instructions for service on defendants. (mll, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Linda Netters, filed by Michael E Posey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(mll, ) |
Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number 6-53817 (mll, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. ***MAILED Consent Form to plaintiff. (mll, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.