Decker v. Lumpkin
Kurby Gerald Decker |
Director TDCJ-CID |
Bobby Lumpkin |
4:2021cv00542 |
February 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
George C Hanks |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 Rule 60 Motion for Correction. Deckers filing fee was paid in full in the Northern District of Texas on February 10, 2021, and no payment is due.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(gkelner, 4) |
Filing 13 Rule 60 Motion for Correction by Kurby Gerald Decker, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/14/2021. (scastillo, 1) |
***Delivery Confirmation for delivery date 3/8/2021 re: 12 Document(s) Sent, filed. (jdav, 4) |
Filing 11 ORDER TO ANSWER. Answer due for Bobby Lumpkin 5/28/2021 (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(gkelner, 4) |
Filing 10 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (RuthGuerreroadi, 4) |
Filing 9 Case transferred in from Texas Northern. Case Number 7:20-cv-00162; certified copy of transfer order, certified docket sheet, and transfer letter received |
Filing 8 Order Transferring to Another District: Case transferred to Houston Division of Southern District of Texas. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 2/19/2021) (plp) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Fri Feb 19 09:28:39 CST 2021 (crt) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Thu Jan 28 12:53:40 CST 2021 (crt) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion to Extend Time. Filing fee due by 3/1/2021. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 1/27/2021) (trt) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Extend Time to pay filing fee filed by Kurby Gerald Decker (trt) |
Filing 5 RESPONSE filed by Kurby Gerald Decker re: #4 Order And Notice of Deficiency, (trt) |
Filing 4 Order and Notice of Deficiency: Kurby Gerald Decker must address the following deficiency: Petitioner has failed to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 2/1/2021. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 12/31/2020) (skg) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Thu Dec 31 10:35:50 CST 2020 (crt) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. File to: No court file needed. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ray (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ray). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (skg) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3. Wed Dec 30 13:51:04 CST 2020 (crt) |
Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (skg) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Kurby Gerald Decker. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (skg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.