AuthWallet, LLC v. Citigroup Inc.
| AuthWallet, LLC |
| Citigroup Inc. and Citibank N.A. |
| 4:2021cv01203 |
| April 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Alfred H Bennett |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Citibank N.A. filed by AuthWallet, LLC. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by AuthWallet, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit US9292852)(Ramey, William) |
| Filing 6 US Patent and Trademark Office Notified. AO 120, filed. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (ChristopherSarratadi, 4) |
Filing 5
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 7/23/2021 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8C before Judge Alfred H Bennett. (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(ChristopherSarratadi, 4)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Citigroup Inc.. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(JosephWells, 4) |
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to AuthWallet, LLC, filed.(Ramey, William) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE AO 120 by AuthWallet, LLC, filed. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Citigroup Inc. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26268014) filed by AuthWallet, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit US929285, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ramey, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
