Espinoza v. ABM Industries Incorporated et al
| Estella H Espinoza |
| ABM Industries Incorporated and GCA Education Services |
| 4:2021cv02463 |
| July 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Andrew S Hanen |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Estella H Espinoza, filed.(Verde, Joshua) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by GCA Education Services, filed.(Baggett, Phillip) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen E. Hart on behalf of ABM Industries Incorporated, GCA Education Services, filed. (Hart, Stephen) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 3/8/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 704 before Magistrate Judge Frances H Stacy. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(JacquelineMataadi, 4)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Harris County District Court, case number 2021-40213 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26819194) filed by GCA Education Services, ABM Industries Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Baggett, Phillip) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
