Boudreaux v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
| Blaine T Boudreaux |
| Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and Bobby Lumpkin |
| 4:2021cv04050 |
| December 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Keith P Ellison |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer Wissinger on behalf of Bobby Lumpkin, filed. (Wissinger, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO ANSWER (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(jguajardo, 4)
|
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM in Support of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Blaine T Boudreaux, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Udashen, Gary)
|
|
Filing 4
STATEMENT Regarding Duplicate Filing of Petition by Blaine T Boudreaux, filed.(Udashen, Gary)
|
|
Filing 3
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0541-27468296) filed by Blaine T Boudreaux.(Udashen, Gary)
|
|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM Memorandum in Support of Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus By a Person in State Custody by Blaine T Boudreaux, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Udashen, Gary)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0541-27463368) filed by Blaine T Boudreaux.(Udashen, Gary)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
