G.S.D. Trading U.S.A., Inc. v. Matthews Brothers Dredging, Inc. et al
| G.S.D. Trading U.S.A., Inc. |
| Matthews Brothers Dredging, Inc. and Vopak Moda Houston, LLC |
| 4:2021cv04061 |
| December 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Andrew S Hanen |
| Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 PROPOSED ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND AND MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS re: #10 MOTION to Remand, filed.(Buzbee, Anthony) |
| Filing 14 REPLY to #11 Response in Opposition to Motion, to Remand, filed by G.S.D. Trading U.S.A., Inc.. (Buzbee, Anthony) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support by Matthews Brothers Dredging, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 2/22/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(James, David) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support by Matthews Brothers Dredging, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 2/22/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(James, David) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition to #10 MOTION to Remand, filed by Matthews Brothers Dredging, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - MSA Between GSD and Vopak, #2 Exhibit B - GSD's Proposal to Perform, #3 Exhibit C - MSA Between Matthews and Vopak, #4 Exhibit D - Vopak's Web Page, #5 Exhibit E - Press Release)(Garner, John) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Remand by G.S.D. Trading U.S.A., Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 2/1/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summary of Costs and Fees, #2 Exhibit Declaration of Anthony G. Buzbee, #3 Exhibit Defendant Vopak's Return of Service)(Buzbee, Anthony) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by G.S.D. Trading U.S.A., Inc., filed.(Buzbee, Anthony) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #2 Answer to State Court Petition/Notice of Removal, Counterclaim with Jury Demand by G.S.D. Trading U.S.A., Inc., filed.(Buzbee, Anthony) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Vopak Moda Houston, LLC, filed.(Jefferson, Dale) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Matthews Brothers Dredging, Inc., filed.(Garner, John) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Matthews Brothers Dredging, Inc., filed.(Garner, John) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 State Court Petition/Notice of Removal by Vopak Moda Houston, LLC, filed.(Jefferson, Dale) |
Filing 3
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 8/9/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 704 before Magistrate Judge Frances H Stacy. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(RachelSalazaradi, 4)
|
| Filing 2 ANSWER to #1 State Court Petition/Notice of Removal with Jury Demand, COUNTERCLAIM against G.S.D. Trading U.S.A., Inc. by Matthews Brothers Dredging, Inc., filed.(Garner, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 234th District Court Harris Co, case number 2021-76029 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-27466888) filed by Matthews Brothers Dredging, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Brief in Support of Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Consent of Removal, #3 Exhibit C - State Court Docket Sheet, #4 Exhibit D - State Court File, #5 Exhibit E - Index of Matters Being Filed, #6 Exhibit F - List of All Counsel of Record, #7 Exhibit G - Copy of Plaintiff's Original Petition, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(James, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
