Charles v. Fahey et al
| Danna D Moore Charles |
| Officer P. Fahey, Dr Festus Uzokwe, Dr. Eileen Starbranch and Dr. William Garcia |
| 4:2022cv00152 |
| January 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| David Hittner |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Summons Issued as to Officer P. Fahey, William Garcia, Eileen Starbranch, Festus Uzokwe. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff in person, filed.(ckrus, 4) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (RachelWillborg, 4) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 4/7/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 703 before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(RachelWillborgadi, 4)
|
| Summons Not Issued as to All Defendants as no completed summons received from plaintiff. Plaintiff notified of deficiencies by email on 1/14/2022, filed.(RachelWillborg, 4) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Danna D Moore Charles. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). Application to Proceed IFP Granted Conditionally on January 11, 2022 by Judge Keith Ellison. (RachelWillborg, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
