Picard v. Noble Drilling Services, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Charles Picard
Defendant: Noble Drilling Services, LLC, Noble Corporation, Noble Drilling Holding LLC and Noble Drilling (US) LLC
Case Number: 4:2022cv00610
Filed: February 24, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Charles Eskridge
Nature of Suit: Marine
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION to Strike #4 MOTION to Remand by Noble Corporation, Noble Drilling Holding LLC, Noble Drilling Services, LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Strickland, Timothy)
March 25, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION to Remand by Charles Picard, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/15/2022. (Grinnan, John)
March 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS. This action is STAYED pending further action by the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(JosephWells, 4)
March 9, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Stay of Proceedings by Noble Corporation, Noble Drilling Holding LLC, Noble Drilling Services, LLC, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Strickland, Timothy)
February 24, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 268th JDC Fort Bend County, case number 22-DCV-291271 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-27798021) filed by Noble Drilling Holding LLC, Noble Corporation, Noble Drilling Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Strickland, Timothy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Picard v. Noble Drilling Services, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Picard
Represented By: Kurt B Arnold
Represented By: John Gregory Grinnan, Jr
Represented By: Jonathan Kyle Findley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Noble Drilling Services, LLC
Represented By: Timothy Wayne Strickland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Noble Corporation
Represented By: Timothy Wayne Strickland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Noble Drilling Holding LLC
Represented By: Timothy Wayne Strickland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Noble Drilling (US) LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?