Smelden v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Amy Smelden
Defendant: Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Case Number: 4:2022cv01283
Filed: April 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Lee H Rosenthal
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 17, 2022 Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Original Complaint by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/8/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ng, Stephanie)
May 4, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric P. Mathisen on behalf of Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, filed. (Mathisen, Eric)
May 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Original Complaint ; Answer due for Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company by 6/21/2022.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(gclair, 4)
May 3, 2022 Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Original Complaint by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/24/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ng, Stephanie)
April 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 8/19/2022 at 10:40 AM by video before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified.(RachelWillborg, 4)
April 22, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (RachelWillborg, 4)
April 21, 2022 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Amy Smelden, filed.(McDonald, Britney Anne)
April 21, 2022 Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, filed.(McDonald, Britney Anne)
April 21, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-28064111) filed by Amy Smelden. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(McDonald, Britney Anne)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smelden v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Smelden
Represented By: Britney Anne Heath McDonald
Represented By: John Anthony Vessel
Represented By: Madison Tate Donaldson
Represented By: Marc Stanley Whitehead
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Represented By: Eric Peter Mathisen
Represented By: Stephanie C Ng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?