Martinez et al v. Capital Bank N.A.
|Plaintiff:||Raquel Vega Martinez and Hugo Vega|
|Defendant:||Capital One, N.A.|
|Filed:||August 15, 2022|
|Court:||US District Court for the Southern District of Texas|
|Presiding Judge:||Sim Lake|
|Nature of Suit:||Contract: Other|
|Cause of Action:||28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal|
|Jury Demanded By:||None|
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
|Date Filed||Document Text|
|October 12, 2022||Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Capital One, N.A., filed. Motion Docket Date 11/2/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Proposed Order)(Huebinger, Alfred)|
|September 6, 2022||Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by A. Jason Huebinger on behalf of Capital One, N.A., filed. (Huebinger, Alfred)|
|September 2, 2022||Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Capital One, N.A., filed.(Madriz, Yasser)|
|August 18, 2022||Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 11/4/2022 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 9B before Judge Sim Lake. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4)|
|August 15, 2022||Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 215, case number 2022-43720 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-28621926) filed by Capital One, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5)(Madriz, Yasser)|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.