Aaron Lamar Livingston Trust et al v. McCraig et al
| Aaron Lamar Livingston Trust, Sherman-D'Wayne Waller and Ahron-Azriel Livingston-Bey |
| Albert M McCraig, Jr, Gary Chaney, Sean Whittmore, Scott Turner, Elton Mathis, Debbie Hollan, Liz Pirkle, Jenifer Duetrich, Stephanie Marie Tompkins, Maria Vargas, Bryan Dasher, Tiffany Bradshaw, George Hill, Matthew Vahalik and Albert M McCaig, Jr |
| 4:2022cv03021 |
| August 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Christina A Bryan |
| Charles Eskridge |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 MOTION to Amend Defendants and Add Party Bennett Dodson Motions referred to Christina A Bryan. by Ahron-Azriel Livingston-Bey, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/9/2022. (AkeitaMichael, 4) |
Filing 22
ORDER re: The motion by Plaintiff Aaron Lamar Livingston Trust for injunctive relief is DENIED. Dkt 20. The initial conference currently set for November 21, 2022, is CANCELLED. All activity in this case beyond the filing of responses and replies to the motions by Defendants to dismiss is STAYED pending ruling on the motions. Dkts 17, 18 & 19.(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(jengonzalez, 4)
|
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Injunction re: #20 Writ for an Injunction by Aaron Lamar Livingston Trust, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(TerriHanniable, 4) |
| Filing 20 Writ for an InjunctionMotions referred to Christina A Bryan. by Aaron Lamar Livingston Trust, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/21/2022. (TerriHanniable, 4) |
| Filing 19 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint, Motions referred to Christina A Bryan. by Tiffany Bradshaw, Bryan Dasher, Jenifer Duetrich, George Hill, Debbie Hollan, Elton Mathis, Liz Pirkle, Stephanie Marie Tompkins, Scott Turner, Matthew Vahalik, Maria Vargas, Sean Whittmore, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - E, #2 Proposed Order granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss)(Simmons, Larry) |
| Filing 18 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint, Motions referred to Christina A Bryan. by Gary Chaney, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/19/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Graydon, Scot) |
| Filing 17 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint, Motions referred to Christina A Bryan. by Albert M McCraig, Jr, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/19/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Graydon, Scot) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Christina A Bryan(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(MelissaMorgan, 4)
|
|
Filing 15
SCHEDULING and DOCKET CONTROL ORDER. Amended Pleadings due by 01/20/2023. Joinder of Parties due by 12/21/2022. Plaintiff Expert Report due by 07/19/2023. Deft Expert Report due by 08/18/2023. Discovery due by 10/03/2023. Mediation due by 12/19/2023. Dispositive Motion Filing due by 11/02/2023. Non-Dispositive Motion Filing due by 11/02/2023. Joint Pretrial Order due by 01/18/2024. Docket Call set for 02/20/2024 at 1:30 PM before Judge Charles Eskridge. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (MelissaMorgan) (Entered: 09/26/2022)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 11/21/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 701 before Magistrate Judge Christina A Bryan(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(MelissaMorgan, 4)
|
| Filing 13 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS and Complaint Executed as to Mathew K. Vahalik served on 9/12/2022, answer due 10/3/2022 filed.(ShannonHolden, 4). |
| Filing 12 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to George Hill served on 9/12/2022, answer due 10/3/2022, filed.(DMcKinnieRichardson, 4) |
| Filing 11 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Tiffany Bradshaw served on 9/12/2022, answer due 10/3/2022, filed.(DMcKinnieRichardson, 4) |
| Filing 10 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Maria Vargas served on 9/12/2022, answer due 10/3/2022, filed.(DMcKinnieRichardson, 4) |
| Filing 9 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Matthew Vahalik served on 9/12/2022, answer due 10/3/2022, filed.(AkeitaMichael, 4) |
| Filing 8 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Stephanie Marie Tompkins served on 9/12/2022, answer due 10/3/2022, filed.(DMcKinnieRichardson, 4) |
| Filing 7 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS and Complaint Executed as to Debbie Hollan served on 9/9/2022, answer due 9/30/2022, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4) |
| Filing 6 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS and Complaint Executed as to Elton Mathis served on 9/9/2022, answer due 9/30/2022, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4) |
| Filing 5 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS and Complaint Executed as to Sean Whittmore served on 9/9/2022, answer due 9/30/2022, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4) |
| Filing 4 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS and Complaint Executed as to Gary Chaney served on 9/13/2022, answer due 10/4/2022, filed.(JacquelineMata, 4) |
| Filing 3 USM 285/Summons Issued as to All Defendants expect Bryan Dasher as address was not provided. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff in person, filed.(ShannonHolden, 4) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (ShannonHolden, 4) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Sherman-D'Wayne Waller, Aaron Lamar Livingston Trust, Aaron Lamar Livingston Bey. Application to Proceed IFP Granted on 08/31/2022 By Judge Hughes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(ShannonHolden, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
