Do et al v. Homesite Insurance Company et al
Andy Do and Gilma Rodriguez |
Homesite Insurance Company and American Family Insurance Claims |
4:2024cv02340 |
June 21, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
George C Hanks |
Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 STATE COURT RECORDS by Homesite Insurance Company, filed. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 citation, #3 request for service, #4 citation form, #5 answer Homesite, #6 notice of removal, #7 Exhibit A to removal) (Jackson, George) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Homesite Insurance Company, filed. (Jackson, George) |
Filing 3 ORDER DESIGNATING MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANDREW M. EDISON.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified. (knp4) |
Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 10/30/2024 at 09:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified. (acj4) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 165th District Court of Harris County, Texas, case number 2024-31694 (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-31795766) filed by Homesite Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Jackson, George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.