Bradley v. Novo Nordisk A/S
| Taline Bradley |
| Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc., Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Commercial Holdings, Inc, Novo Nordisk Inc., Novo Nordisk Research Center Seattle, Inc. and Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical Industries LP |
| 4:2024cv02406 |
| June 26, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Interdistrict transfer to Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Case transferred electronically. (ltg4) |
| Filing 3 JPML CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-17) transferring case to Eastern District of Pennsylvania to be included in MDL Docket No. 3094. (ltg4) |
Filing 2
ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 10/11/2024 at 10:10 AM by video before Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified. (hlc4)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Novo Nordisk A/S (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-31815233) filed by Taline Bradley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Gallagher, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
