James v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, et al
| Jabari Shabazz James |
| HARRIS COUNTY JAIL and CITY OF HOUSTON |
| 4:2024cv04869 |
| December 11, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Sim Lake |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jabari Shabazz James, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/2/2025. (bsg4) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (csr4) |
| Filing 2 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (csr4) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against CITY OF HOUSTON, HARRIS COUNTY JAIL (Filing fee $ 405) filed by Jabari Shabazz James. (Attachments: #1 Application to proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs) (csr4) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Dena Hanovice Palermo randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (csr4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
