Wells v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
| Cantania Rochell Wells |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| 4:2025cv01504 |
| April 1, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 RETURN of Service, filed. (dah4) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Experian Information Solutions, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 6/10/2025. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Zahn, Steven) |
| Summons Issued as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff in person, filed. (bwl4) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Experian Information Solutions, Inc., filed. (Zahn, Steven) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven R. Zahn on behalf of Experian Information Solutions, Inc., filed. (Zahn, Steven) |
| Filing 6 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc. served on 4/30/2025, answer due 5/21/2025, filed. (dah4) |
| Summons Issued as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff in person, filed. (bli4) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Address to serve Defendant by Cantania Rochell Wells, filed. (abb4) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (abb4) |
Filing 3
ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 7/3/2025 at 09:40 AM by video before Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified. (abb4)
|
| Filing 2 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (abb4) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Richard W. Bennett randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (abb4) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Experian Information Solutions, Inc. filed by Cantania Rochell Wells. Application to Proceed IFP Granted on April 01, 2025, by Judge Alfred H. Bennett. (abb4) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/2/2025: #1 Exhibit) (abb4). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wells v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cantania Rochell Wells | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Steven R Zahn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
