Arce v. Davis

Arce v. Davis

Petitioner:	Ruben Arce
Respondent:	Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Case Number:	5:2018cv00009
Filed:	January 22, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office:	Laredo Office
County:	Webb
Presiding Judge:	George P Kazen
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 10, 2019	Filing 41 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 34 Report and Recommendations. The Court OVERRULES Petitioner's objections andADOPTS the Report and Recommendation 34 as the findings and opinionof the Court. Accordingly, Respondents' Mot ion for Summary Judgment 23 is GRANTED, Petitioner's Motion for Leave for Discovery 30 is DENIED, and this civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Should Petitioner seek a certificate of appealability, it is DENIED, and the Court certifies that any appeal should not be taken in forma pauperis. (Signed by Judge Marina Garcia Marmolejo) Parties notified.(ehernandez, 5)
March 18, 2019	Filing 37 ORDER adopting 34 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Respondent's 23 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Petitioner's 30 MOTION for leave for Discovery is DENIED. This civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. COA Denied. The Court certifies that any appeal should not be taken in forma pauperis.(Signed by Judge Marina Garcia Marmolejo) Parties notified.(dmorales, 5)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 10, 2019

Filing 41 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 34 Report and Recommendations. The Court OVERRULES Petitioner's objections andADOPTS the Report and Recommendation 34 as the findings and opinionof the Court. Accordingly, Respondents' Mot ion for Summary Judgment 23 is GRANTED, Petitioner's Motion for Leave for Discovery 30 is DENIED, and this civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Should Petitioner seek a certificate of appealability, it is DENIED, and the Court certifies that any appeal should not be taken in forma pauperis. (Signed by Judge Marina Garcia Marmolejo) Parties notified.(ehernandez, 5)

March 18, 2019

Filing 37 ORDER adopting 34 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Respondent's 23 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Petitioner's 30 MOTION for leave for Discovery is DENIED. This civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. COA Denied. The Court certifies that any appeal should not be taken in forma pauperis.(Signed by Judge Marina Garcia Marmolejo) Parties notified.(dmorales, 5)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arce v. Davis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Ruben Arce
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Represented By:	Edward Larry Marshall
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?