Gaalla et al v. Citizens Medical Center et al
| Dakshesh "Kumar&quo Parikh, Harish Chandna and Ajay Gaalla |
| Joe Bland, Andrew Clemmons, Hartman Jennifer, Citizens Medical Center, David P. Brown, William Todd Campbell, Luis Guerra, Paul Holm and Donald Day |
| 6:2010cv00014 |
| February 24, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Victoria Office |
| Anderson |
| Janis Graham Jack |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 02 U.S.C. ยง 431 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
414
AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part denying in part 135 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 267 BRIEF in Support Pursuant to Fifth Circuit Remand Order; denying as moot 282 Motion to Strike, denying as moot 326 Opposed MOTION to Strike.(Signed by Judge Gregg Costa) Parties notified.(arrivera, )
|
|
Filing
406
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part denying in part 135 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 267 BRIEF in Support Pursuant to Fifth Circuit Remand Order; denying as moot 282 Motion to Strike, denying as moot 326 Opposed MOTION to Strike. (Signed by Judge Gregg Costa) Parties notified.(arrivera, )
|
|
Filing
325
ORDER denying 253 Sealed Motion.(Signed by Judge Gregg Costa) Parties notified.(ccarnew, )
|
|
Filing
307
ORDER granting 287 Motion for Summary Judgment based on Absolute Immunity.(Signed by Judge Gregg Costa) Parties notified.(ccarnew, )
|
|
Filing
231
ORDER denying 203 Motion for Sanctions.(Signed by Judge Janis Graham Jack) Parties notified.(sscotch, )
|
|
Filing
191
ORDER granting 182 Motion to Stay this Case Pending Interlocutory Appeal of Immunity Issues. This action is STAYED until the interlocutory appeal is resolved. The Court, however, retains jurisdiction to enforce the March 12, 2010 preliminary injunction against Defendant CMC.(Signed by Judge Janis Graham Jack) Parties notified.(mserpa, )
|
|
Filing
177
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 120 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 133 Sealed Motion; granting in part and denying in part 134 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 135 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 152 Motion to Strike; granting 174 Motion for Leave to File; granting 175 Motion for Leave to File; granting 176 Motion for Leave to File.(Signed by Judge Janis Graham Jack) Parties notified.(lcayce, )
|
|
Filing
171
ORDER granting 115 Motion for Contempt. The Court orders CMC to pay Plaintiffs attorneys fees in theamount of $14,539.40 by noon on December 23, 2010, made jointly payable to Plaintiffs.(Signed by Judge Janis Graham Jack) Parties notified.(mserpa, )
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER denying 105 MOTION for Leave to File To File Third Amended Complaint, striking 106 Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint.(Signed by Judge Janis Graham Jack) Parties notified.(bcortez, )
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER granting 78 Motion to Dismiss; granting 79 Motion to Dismiss; granting 81 Motion to Dismiss.(Signed by Judge Janis Graham Jack) Parties notified.(mserpa, )
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER Denying 64 Motion to Extend Deadline for Joinder of Parties.(Signed by Judge Janis Graham Jack) Parties notified.(srussell, )
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER; Granting oral motion for preliminary injunction.. Plaintiffs are to provide a $500 cash bond to the Clerk of Court by noon on Friday, 3/12/10.(Signed by Judge Janis Graham Jack) Parties notified. (srussell, )
|
|
Filing
4
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. (Signed by Judge Janis Graham Jack.) Parties notified. (yhausmann, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
