Mejia v. Stephens
Petitioner: David Mejia
Respondent: William Stephens
Case Number: 6:2013cv00047
Filed: July 10, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Victoria Office
County: Anderson
Presiding Judge: Gregg Costa
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 62 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER andORDER FOR CONDITIONAL GRANT OF WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (Signed by Judge Nancy F Atlas) Parties notified.(sashabranner, 4)
May 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER ADOPTING PORTIONS OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DEEMING PETITION A SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION, AND WIHDRAWING REFERENCE Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation [Doc. #54] is ADOPTED in part and Respondents Amended Mot ion for SummaryJudgment [Doc. # 47] is GRANTED in part. Summary judgment is granted toRespondent on Petitioners claims that (i) Petitioner was denied due process by theStates alleged concealment of its promises not to prosecute witnesses and its alle gedthreats against witnesses; (ii) Petitioners trial counsel rendered ineffective assistanceof counsel for failure to examine the States witnesses about promises of immunityfrom prosecution or threats against them; (iii) Petitioner was constructively deniedcounsel on direct appeal; and (iv) Petitioners trial counsel rendered ineffectiveassistance at the punishment phase for failure to investigate Petitioners juvenilecriminal record. It is further4 (...continued)that trial counsel was ineffective for failure to call Marcus Mejia to the witness stand.The Court declines to adopt the Report and Recommendation on this point, and theparties may address these issues in their supplemental briefing.P:\ORDERS.Prsnr\2013\V47.wpd 170525. 1147 4ORDERED that, regarding the remaining issues (ineffective assistance ofcounsel for failure to call Marcus Mejia as a witness, for counsels failure to disclosea direct conflict of interest, and for counsels failure to request jury instructions o nlesser-included offenses), the Court deems the Petition [Doc. # 45] a motion forsummary judgment upon which the Court may grant relief. The parties may submitsupplemental briefing limited to these issues on or before June 7, 2017, and may filerespon ses on or before June 16, 2017. It is furtherORDERED that the Court hereby WITHDRAWS the reference of thisproceeding to United States Magistrate Judge John Froeschner. This Court willadjudicate all pending and future matters. Courtesy copies of all documents filedhereafter must be provided promptly to the undersigned.SIGNED at Houston, Texas, this 25th day of May, 2017.(Signed by Judge Nancy F Atlas) Parties notified.(sashabranner, 4)
August 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Signed by Judge Nancy F. Atlas) Parties notified.(sashabranner, 4)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mejia v. Stephens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: David Mejia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William Stephens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?