Cantu v. Scoggins et al
| Alicia Cantu |
| Timothy C Scoggins and Calvin M Scoggins |
| 6:2019cv00003 |
| January 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Kenneth M Hoyt |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Calvin M Scoggins, Timothy C Scoggins, filed.(Miller, Allison) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Calvin M Scoggins, Timothy C Scoggins, filed.(Berg, Brandon) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Alicia Cantu, filed.(Shipman, Taylor) |
| Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff in person, filed.(jguajardo, 4) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference by Telephone and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Counsel who filed or removed the action is responsible for placing the conference call and insuring that all parties are on the line. The call shall be placed to (713)250-5613. Telephone Conference set for 4/17/2019 at 09:00 AM before Judge Kenneth M Hoyt. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt.) Parties notified. (yhausmann, 6)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Calvin M Scoggins, Timothy C Scoggins (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-21611274) filed by Alicia Cantu.(Lapeze, Keith) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
