Razo v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Rosalinda Razo |
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. |
7:2021cv00349 |
September 17, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Randy Crane |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER regarding #9 Motion for Protective Order. (Signed by Judge Randy Crane) Parties notified.(kanelson, 7) |
Filing 9 Agreed MOTION for Protective Order by CVS Pharmacy, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 11/30/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Agreed Protective Order)(Byers, Nisha) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Mandatory Initial Discovery Responses by CVS Pharmacy, Inc., filed. (Scully, John) |
Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER. Amended Pleadings due by 5/13/2022. Joinder of Parties due by 5/13/2022 Pltf Expert Report due by 6/3/2022. Deft Expert Report due by 6/17/2022. Discovery due by 7/8/2022. Dispositive Motion Filing due by 7/22/2022. Non-Dispositive Motion Filing due by 7/22/2022. Joint Pretrial Order due by 8/29/2022. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/6/2022 at 09:30 AM before Judge Randy Crane Jury Selection set for 9/7/2022 at 09:00 AM before Judge Randy Crane Motion Hearing set for 8/19/2022 at 09:30 AM before Judge Randy Crane(Signed by Judge Randy Crane) Parties notified.(SandraSilva, 7) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Resetting. Parties notified. Initial Conference reset for 11/3/2021 at 10:00 AM in by video before Judge Randy Crane, filed. (DeliaRodriguez, 7) |
Filing 5 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by CVS Pharmacy, Inc., filed.(Byers, Nisha) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Rosalinda Razo, filed.(Cisneros, Michael) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by CVS Pharmacy, Inc., filed.(Scully, John) |
Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 11/3/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge Randy Crane (by Judge Randy Crane) Parties notified.(klopez, 7) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hidalgo County, Texas, case number C-2801-21-B (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-27062539) filed by CVS Pharmacy, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Index of State Court Filings, #2 Exhibit A - Citation, #3 Exhibit B. - Original Petition, #4 Exhibit C. - CVS Original Answer, #5 Exhibit D. - State Court's Docket Sheet, #6 Exhibit E. - List of Counsel, #7 Exhibit 2 - Civil Cover Sheet)(Scully, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Razo v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rosalinda Razo | |
Represented By: | Michael J Cisneros |
Represented By: | Arturo Cisneros |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: CVS Pharmacy, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Nisha P Byers |
Represented By: | John A Scully |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.