Collision Masters, Inc. v. Harco National Insurance Company
| Collision Masters, Inc. |
| Harco National Insurance Company |
| 7:2022cv00340 |
| September 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Micaela Alvarez |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Harco National Insurance Company, filed.(Beer, Barrie) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with jury demand by Harco National Insurance Company, filed.(Beer, Barrie) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Collision Masters, Inc., filed.(Ochoa, Omar) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Harco National Insurance Company. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(klopez, 7) |
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Harco National Insurance Company, filed.(Ochoa, Omar) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 12/13/2022 at 09:00 AM before Judge Micaela Alvarez(by Judge Micaela Alvarez) Parties notified.(JenniferNogueira, 7)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Harco National Insurance Company (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-28827953) filed by Collision Masters, Inc..(Ochoa, Omar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
