United States of America v. $104,640.80 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account #xx9230 et al

Defendant: $104,640.80 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account #xx9230 and $61,230.82 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account #xx8716
Plaintiff: United States of America
Case Number: 1:2013cv00185
Filed: March 5, 2013
Court: Texas Western District Court
Office: Austin Office
Presiding Judge: Lee Yeakel
Nature of Suit: Forfeit/Penalty: Other
Cause of Action: 31:5324 Structuring of Financial Transactions
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. $104,640.80 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account #xx9230 et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: $104,640.80 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account #xx9230
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: $61,230.82 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account #xx8716
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Daniel M. Castillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.