Stockade Companies, LLC et al v. Kelly Restaurant Group, LLC
Stockade Companies, LLC and Stockade Franchising, LP |
Kelly Restaurant Group, LLC |
1:2017cv00143 |
February 24, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Austin Office |
Robert Pitman |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 44 Trademark Infringement |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 106 ORDER DENYING 96 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Andrew W. Austin. (dl) |
Filing 87 ORDER DENYING Plaintiffs' Opposed 66 Motion to Compel and for Discovery Sanctions. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (klw) |
Filing 86 ORDER DENYING 44 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (jf) |
Filing 55 ORDER DENYING Defendant's 51 Motion for Reconsideration. Defendant shall respond to all discovery requests, including requests for production, on or before 08/07/17. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (klw) |
Filing 48 ORDER MOOTING 36 Motion to Dismiss ; GRANTING 39 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (jf) |
Filing 34 ORDER DENYING 28 Motion for Discovery; DENYING 31 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (dm) |
Filing 26 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 14 Motion for Preliminary Injunction Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (ml) |
Filing 20 ORDER DENYING Kelly's Opposed 7 Motion to Compel Arbitration. Signed by Judge Andrew W. Austin. (klw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.