Singh, Ph.D. v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. et al
| Ravindra Singh, Ph.D. |
| Ex-Police Chief Art Acevedo, Austin Police Department, City of Austin, Officer John Doe I, Alan Martindale, Officer Richard W. Miller, Eva Marie Moseley, Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC |
| 1:2017cv01120 |
| November 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Austin Office |
| Robert Pitman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
158
ORDER GRANTING 124 Motion to Dismiss. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (dm)
|
|
Filing
114
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 109 Order,, Report and Recommendations,, Terminate Motions,, Motions terminated: 86 Opposed MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution filed by Richard W. Miller, 92 MOTION to Dismiss for Plaintiff's Failure to Cooperate in Discovery & Failure to Comply with the Court's Order filed by Eva Marie Moseley, Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC, Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Alan Martindale.. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cc3)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER ADOPTING IN PART 37 Report and Recommendations. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART City Defendants' 18 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (lt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
