Flowers v. CoreLogic National Background Data, LLC
William Flowers |
CoreLogic National Background Data, LLC, f/k/a/ National Background Data, LLC and CoreLogic National Background Data, LLC |
1:2018cv01037 |
December 3, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Robert Pitman |
Labor: Other |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #5 Disclosure Statement (Rule 7) (dm) |
Filing 6 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #4 Answer to Complaint (dm) |
Filing 5 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by CoreLogic National Background Data, LLC. (Flynn, Virginia) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Affirmative and Other Defenses. Attorney Virginia Bell Flynn added to party CoreLogic National Background Data, LLC(pty:dft) by CoreLogic National Background Data, LLC.(Flynn, Virginia) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to CoreLogic National Background Data, LLC. (cj) |
Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by William Flowers. (cj) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by William Flowers. (O'Brien, Kerry) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-11514104), filed by William Flowers. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(O'Brien, Kerry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.