NetSpend Corporation v. Crisci et al
| NetSpend Corporation |
| Stephen Conti and Gregory Crisci |
| 1:2018cv01064 |
| December 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Stephen Conti, Gregory Crisci. (Grayson, John) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Index of Matters Submitted with Notice of Removal and State Court Record by Stephen Conti, Gregory Crisci (Grayson, John) |
Filing 4
ORDER that the removing party supplement the record with state court pleadings. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (afd)
|
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Stephen Conti, Gregory Crisci Amended Certificate of Service (Grayson, John) |
| Filing 2 JS44 (Civil Cover Sheet) submitted by Stephen Conti, Gregory Crisci. (Grayson, John) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (afd) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Stephen Conti, Gregory Crisci (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-11538703), filed by Stephen Conti, Gregory Crisci. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Grayson, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
