Son v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
| Carol Cunningham Son |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| 1:2019cv00493 |
| May 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., re #4 MOTION to Dismiss and MOTION for Sanctions filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Thomason, Joel) |
| Filing 9 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Carol Cunningham Son, re #4 MOTION to Dismiss and MOTION for Sanctions filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., #8 MOTION for Leave to File Motion for leave to respond Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and for Sanctions filed by Plaintiff Carol Cunningham Son (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Proposed Order)(Trevino, Lu Ann) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to File Motion for leave to respond Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and for Sanctions by Carol Cunningham Son. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Trevino, Lu Ann) |
Filing 7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to Carol Cunningham Son. Show Cause Response due by 6/20/2019,. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (afd)
|
| Filing 6 ATTACHMENT Proposed Order to #4 MOTION to Dismiss and MOTION for Sanctions by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Thomason, Joel) |
| Filing 5 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #4 MOTION to Dismiss and MOTION for Sanctions (afd) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss and, MOTION for Sanctions by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Thomason, Joel) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER that the removing party supplement the record with state court pleadings, if it has not already done so. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cj)
|
| Filing 2 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Thomason, Joel) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-12082696), filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Supplement to Civil Cover Sheet)(Thomason, Joel) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Son v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carol Cunningham Son | |
| Represented By: | Lu Ann Trevino |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Joel R. Thomason |
| Represented By: | Robert T. Mowrey |
| Represented By: | Benjamin David Lee Foster |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
