Blodgett et al v. Hughs
Plaintiff: Texas College Democrats, Texas Young Democrats and Terrell Blodgett
Defendant: Ruth R. Hughs
Case Number: 1:2019cv01154
Filed: November 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Lee Yeakel
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Voting
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that this Cause No. 1:19-CV-1154-LY is consolidated with and into Cause No. 1:19-CV-1063-LY. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (lt)
December 30, 2019 All future filings should be made in 1:19-cv-1063-LY (lead case). Please do not file any further documents in this case. (lt)
December 17, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by Ruth R. Hughs. (Sweeten, Patrick)
November 27, 2019 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Terrell Blodgett, Texas College Democrats, Texas Young Democrats. Ruth R. Hughs served on 11/26/2019, answer due 12/17/2019. (Hicks, Max)
November 26, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ruth R. Hughs. (cj)
November 26, 2019 Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Terrell Blodgett, Texas College Democrats, Texas Young Democrats. (Hicks, Max)
November 26, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Summons Requested at this Time ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-12893418), filed by Terrell Blodgett, Texas College Democrats, Texas Young Democrats. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hicks, Max)
November 26, 2019 Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj)
November 26, 2019 If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane (cj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blodgett et al v. Hughs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Texas College Democrats
Represented By: Max Renea Hicks
Represented By: Michael John Weills Siegel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Texas Young Democrats
Represented By: Max Renea Hicks
Represented By: Michael John Weills Siegel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terrell Blodgett
Represented By: Max Renea Hicks
Represented By: Michael John Weills Siegel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ruth R. Hughs
Represented By: Patrick K. Sweeten
Represented By: William Thomas Thompson
Represented By: Michael Abrams
Represented By: Matthew Hamilton Frederick
Represented By: Todd Lawrence Disher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?