Johnson v. Fredrick et al
Edward Johnson |
Sally Hernandez, Brenda Kennedy, Greg Abbott, Joe Fredrick and Jean Sullivan |
1:2020cv01000 |
September 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Mark Lane |
Robert Pitman |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Petition for Ruling on Motion for Discovery by Edward Johnson. Motions referred to Judge Mark Lane. (lt) |
Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Defendant's Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Seeking Dismissal for Lack of Speedy Trial/Due Process of Law by Edward Johnson. (lt) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Edward Johnson. Motions referred to Judge Mark Lane. (lt) |
Filing 2 ORDER that Petitioner, within thirty (30) days of the filing of this Order,must submit either the filing fee of $5.00 or a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (Attachments: #1 IFP - Prisoner)(cj) |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 is DUE.), filed by Edward Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, Cover Letter, and Envelope)(cj) |
Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane. (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.