Sutherland Global Services, Inc. v. Sengupta et al
| Sutherland Global Services, Inc. |
| Sitel Operating Corporation and Ratul Sengupta |
| 1:2021cv00401 |
| May 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Sitel Operating Corporation. (Adamek, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 12 Defendants' ANSWER to #1 Complaint, . Attorney Elizabeth Adamek added to party Ratul Sengupta(pty:dft), Attorney Elizabeth Adamek added to party Sitel Operating Corporation(pty:dft) by Ratul Sengupta, Sitel Operating Corporation.(Adamek, Elizabeth) |
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING Brian J. Capitummino's #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Plaintiff. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (jv2)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING F. Michael Ostrander's #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Plaintiff. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (jv2)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Lessie C. Gilstrap for Brian J. Capitummino ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14793112) by on behalf of Sutherland Global Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gilstrap, Lessie) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Lessie C. Gilstrap for F. Michael Ostrander ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14792950) by on behalf of Sutherland Global Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gilstrap, Lessie) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sutherland Global Services, Inc.. Sitel Operating Corporation served on 5/7/2021, answer due 5/28/2021. (Gilstrap, Lessie) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sutherland Global Services, Inc.. Ratul Sengupta served on 5/8/2021, answer due 6/1/2021. (Gilstrap, Lessie) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Ratul Sengupta, Sitel Operating Corporation. (cj) |
| Filing 4 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Sutherland Global Services, Inc.. (Gilstrap, Lessie) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Sutherland Global Services, Inc.. for Sitel Operating Corporation (Gilstrap, Lessie) (Main Document 3 replaced and flattened on 5/6/2021) (cj). |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Sutherland Global Services, Inc.. for Ratul Sengupta (Gilstrap, Lessie) (Main Document 2 replaced and flattened on 5/6/2021) (cj). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-14778007), filed by Sutherland Global Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D)(Gilstrap, Lessie) (Attachment 1 replaced and flattened on 5/6/2021) (cj). |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Hightower (cj) |
| Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
