Douglas v. Department of the Treasury
| Alexander Logan Douglas |
| Department of the Treasury |
| 1:2021cv00617 |
| July 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Mark Lane |
| Robert Pitman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Certified mail acknowledgment receipt re #9 Report and Recommendation, as to Alexander Logan Douglas. (lt) |
| Filing 10 Copy of #9 Report and Recommendation sent via certified mail, as to Alexander Logan Douglas. (lt) |
| Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the United States Magistrate Judge re #1 Complaint filed by Alexander Logan Douglas. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (lt) |
Filing 8
ORDER Granting #6 Application to Proceed in forma pauperis and Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Alexander Logan Douglas (Ohio #744-414). ORDER that Alexander Logan Douglas (Ohio #744-414) is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $4.54. ORDER that the Clerk of the Court shall not issue summons nor forward summons to the United States Marshal for service on defendants unless and until directed by further Order of the Court. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (lt)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER VACATING Order of Dismissal (Dkt. #5 ) and REOPENING case. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (lt)
|
| Copy of Order #8 sent via first class mail to Mansfield Correctional Institution, Attention Finance, 1150 North Main Street, P.O. Box 788, Mansfield, OH 44901. (lt) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Alexander Logan Douglas. (lt) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE for want of prosecution and for failure to obey an order of the court. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (lt)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER that the Clerk shall forward to Plaintiff an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff must submit on or before August 13, 2021, the completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or the $402.00 filing fee. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed IFP)(lt)
|
| Filing 3 Case Opening Letter mailed to Alexander Logan Douglas. (cj) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cj)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Filing fee $ 402is DUE.), filed by Alexander Logan Douglas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet and Envelope)(cj) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Douglas v. Department of the Treasury | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alexander Logan Douglas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Department of the Treasury | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
