Quail Energy Services, LP v. Hexion Inc.
| Quail Energy Services, LP |
| Hexion Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00951 |
| October 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss by Hexion Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Defendant Hexion Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss)(Lee, Stephen) |
Filing 11
ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE #4 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (jv2)
|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Quail Energy Services, LP, re #4 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant Hexion Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Order)(Watts, Joseph) |
| Filing 9 COMPLAINT Amended, filed by Quail Energy Services, LP.(Watts, Joseph) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING #7 Joseph K. Watt's Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Plaintiff. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (jv2)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Kevin K. Watts (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 100040475) by Quail Energy Services, LP. (jv2) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Hexion Inc. #4 MOTION to Dismiss (Lee, Stephen) |
| Filing 5 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #4 MOTION to Dismiss (jv2) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by Hexion Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Defendant Hexion Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss)(Lee, Stephen) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER that the removing party supplement the record with state court pleadings, if it has not already done so. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (cj)
|
|
Filing 2
Order Directing Jospeh K. Watts to File a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice within 14 days. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (cj)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Hexion Inc. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0542-15358155), filed by Hexion Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Civil Cover Sheet Supplement)(Lee, Stephen) |
| Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Quail Energy Services, LP v. Hexion Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Quail Energy Services, LP | |
| Represented By: | Joseph K. Watts |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hexion Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Stephen H. Lee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
