Davis v. Lumpkin
| Edward Lee Davis |
| Bobby Lumpkin |
| 1:2022cv01027 |
| October 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Mark Lane |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Rhett Wayne Bartlett on behalf of Bobby Lumpkin. Attorney Rhett Wayne Bartlett added to party Bobby Lumpkin(pty:res) (Bartlett, Rhett) |
Filing 12
ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT to ANSWER PETITION. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (pg)
|
| Filing 11 Filing fee received in the amount of $5, receipt number 537 (pg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/18/2022: #1 Filing Fee Letter) (pg). |
|
Filing 10
DEFICIENCY ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Edward Lee Davis. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (pg)
|
| Filing 9 Case Opening Letter mailed to Edward Lee Davis. (rn) |
| Filing 8 JS44 (Civil Cover Sheet) submitted (rn) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER (DATED 08/11/2016) REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (rn)
|
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane (rn) |
| Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (rn) |
| Filing 6 Case electronically transferred in from Southern District of Texas; Case Number 1:22-cv-00140. |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to Western District of Texas, Austin Division (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald G Morgan) Parties notified.(EdnitaPonce, 1) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/12/2022.]
|
| Interdistrict transfer to Western District of Texas, Austin Division. Case transferred electronically, filed. (EdnitaPonce, 1) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/12/2022.] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (EfrainGarcia, 1) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/12/2022.] |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Edward Lee Davis, filed.(EfrainGarcia, 1) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/12/2022.] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Edward Lee Davis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(EfrainGarcia, 1) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/12/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davis v. Lumpkin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Edward Lee Davis | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin | |
| Represented By: | Edward L. Marshall |
| Represented By: | Rhett Wayne Bartlett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
