Dickson v. Berryhill
| Daniel Dickson |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| 3:2019cv00142 |
| May 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert F Castaneda |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Robert F. Castaneda for all proceedings. Judge Philip R. Martinez no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Philip R. Martinez. (dt)
|
| Filing 9 CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Nancy A. Berryhill. (Lin, Mary) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE: Request for U.S. Marshals Service Expenses in Pauper Case (mg2) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed Nancy A. Berryhill served on 6/10/2019, answer due 8/9/2019; Social Security Liaison served on 6/10/2019, answer due 8/9/2019; U.S. Attorney Liaison served on 6/10/2019, answer due 8/9/2019. (mg2) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to The United States Attorney c/o Civil Process Clerk (mg2) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill, Office of the General Counsel Region VI, Regional Chief Counsel(mg2) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to The United States Attorney General(mg2) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 0 receipt number xxxxx), filed by Daniel Dickson.(mg2) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis entered by Judge Philip R. Martinez. It is ordered that the clerk shall immediately file Plaintiff Daniel Dickson's Complaint. It is further ordered that, as soon as possible, the clerk shall immediately serve a copy of Plaintiff Daniel Dickson's Complaint on Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mw)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Art Werge on behalf of Daniel Dickson (Werge, Art) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Daniel Dickson. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Complaint, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Consent)(mn) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/28/2019: #6 Summons) (mm1). (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/28/2019: #7 Summons) (mm1). (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/28/2019: #8 Summons) (mm1). |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Castaneda (mn) |
| Case assigned to Judge Philip R. Martinez. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (mn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dickson v. Berryhill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel Dickson | |
| Represented By: | Art Werge |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill | |
| Represented By: | Mary F. Lin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
