Colunga v. Sarver
Plaintiff: Rene Colunga
Defendant: Matthew Sarver
Case Number: 3:2019cv00233
Filed: August 21, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Kathleen Cardone
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION to Substitute Party by Matthew Sarver. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(jg1)
August 21, 2019 If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Torres (jg1)
August 21, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL, filed by Rene Colunga. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Supplemental)(jg1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Colunga v. Sarver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew Sarver
Represented By: Natashia Denise Hines
Represented By: Manuel Romero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rene Colunga
Represented By: Rodrigo Vicente Ramos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?