Medina v. Astrue
Rudy Medina |
Michael J. Astrue |
5:2008cv00644 |
August 4, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI Office |
Bexar |
John W. Primomo |
Xavier Rodriguez |
None |
U.S. Government Defendant |
42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 17 Report and Recommendations - the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. Plaintiff's petition to reverse or remand the Commissioner's decision is DENIED. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (rg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Medina v. Astrue | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rudy Medina | |
Represented By: | Suzanne Villalon-Hinojosa |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.