B.B. et al v. Perez et al
Raymond Baco, B.B., Lucil Basco and Raymond Basco |
Officer A Uriegas, Officer G. Trevino, John Doe, Confidential Informant, Officer B. Smith, Officer, J. Rodrigues, Officer, B. Wolfe, Texas Department of Public Safety John Doe Officers, Bexar County Sherriffs Office John Doe Officers 1-5, Sergeant, James Hancock, Officer, J Perez, Drugs and Enforcement Agency John Doe Agents 1-10, Officer, P. Hardeman, Officer E Richards, Officer, C Davis, Officer, E. Zander, Officer E. Zander, Officer Jesse Perez, Officer Portia Hardeman, Officer J. Rodriguez #30053, Officer B Wolfe #13031, Officer B. Smith #20790, Texas Department of Public Safety John Doe Officers 1-10, Officer C. Davis, Officer E. Richards #2807, Sergeant James Hancock #9130, Officer A. Uriegas #4038 and John Doe Confidential Informant |
5:2018cv01332 |
December 24, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Orlando L Garcia |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by B.B., Lucil Basco, Raymond Basco, re #11 MOTION for a More Definite Statement filed by Defendant Officer Portia Hardeman, Defendant Officer Jesse Perez (Radner, Solomon) |
Filing 11 MOTION for a More Definite Statement by Officer J. Perez #14515, Officer P. Hardeman. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lindsey, Christopher) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand . Attorney Christopher L. Lindsey added to party Officer J. Perez #14515(pty:dft), Attorney Christopher L. Lindsey added to party Officer P. Hardeman(pty:dft) by Officer J. Perez #14515, Officer P. Hardeman.(Lindsey, Christopher) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand . Attorney Robert William Piatt, III added to party Officer A. Uriegas #4038(pty:dft) by Officer A. Uriegas #4038.(Piatt, Robert) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand . Attorney Robert William Piatt, III added to party Officer B Wolfe #13031(pty:dft) by Officer B Wolfe #13031.(Piatt, Robert) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lucil Basco, B.B., Raymond Basco. Officer B Wolfe #13031 served on 1/19/2019, answer due 2/11/2019. (Radner, Solomon) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lucil Basco, B.B., Raymond Basco. Officer A. Uriegas #4038 served on 1/19/2019, answer due 2/11/2019. (Radner, Solomon) |
Filing 5 Pro Hac Vice Letter to attorney Solomon M. Radner regarding admission to the Western District of Texas. (bc) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Officer A. Uriegas #4038, Officer B. Smith #20790, Officer B. Wolfe, Officer C. Davis, Officer E. Richards #2807, Officer E. Zander, Officer J. Perez #14515, Officer J. Rodriguez #30053, Officer P. Hardeman, Sergeant James Hancock #9130, Officer G. Trevino. (bc) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by B.B., Raymond Baco, Lucil Basco. (Radner, Solomon) |
Filing 2 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint Civil Cover Sheet by B.B., Raymond Baco, Lucil Basco. (Radner, Solomon) |
Case assigned to Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (bc) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (bc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-11586901). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Raymond Baco, Lucil Basco, B.B..(Radner, Solomon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.