Payne et al v. City of San Antonio, Texas, et al
| Don Albert Payne and Gloria Jean Payne |
| Amy V. Carillo, City of San Antonio, Officer Shannon Purkiss, San Antonio Police Department, San Antonio Housing Authority, City of San Antonio, Texas, Amy V. Carrillo, Officer William Kasberg and Officer Gerardo Morales |
| 5:2019cv00020 |
| January 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Xavier Rodriguez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Pro Se Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Don Albert Payne, Gloria Jean Payne, re #7 CORRECTED MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant Amy V. Carrillo (aej) |
| Filing 13 Pro Se Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Don Albert Payne, Gloria Jean Payne, re #10 MOTION for Sanctions Under Rule 11 filed by Defendant Amy V. Carrillo (aej) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Amy V. Carrillo, re #11 MOTION for Entry of Default against San Antonio Housing Authority and City of San Antonio filed by Plaintiff Don Albert Payne, Plaintiff Gloria Jean Payne (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dennis, Stephen) |
| Filing 11 PRO SE MOTION for Entry of Default against San Antonio Housing Authority and City of San Antonio by Don Albert Payne, Gloria Jean Payne. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Proposed Order)(aej) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Sanctions Under Rule 11 by Amy V. Carrillo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Dennis, Stephen) |
| Filing 9 PRO SE Memorandum of Facts and Law in Support of Motion to Remand to State Court by Don Albert Payne, Gloria Jean Payne. (aej) Modified on 2/4/2019 (aej). |
| Filing 8 PRO SE MOTION for Entry of Default against Amy V. Carrillo, William Kasberg, Gerardo Morales and Shannon Purkiss by Don Albert Payne, Gloria Jean Payne. (aej) |
| Filing 7 CORRECTED MOTION to Dismiss by Amy V. Carrillo. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dennis, Stephen) |
| Filing 6 DEFICIENCY NOTICE:***NOTIFIED COUNSEL THAT PLEADING NEEDS TO HAVE AN UPDATED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE TO REFLECT PROPER SERVICE*** re #5 MOTION to Dismiss (aej) |
| Filing 5 ***DOCUMENT DEFICIENT - CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE NEEDS TO BE AMENDED*** MOTION to Dismiss by Amy V. Carrillo. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dennis, Stephen) Modified on 1/14/2019 (aej). Modified on 1/14/2019 (aej). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by City of San Antonio, Texas re #3 Pro Hac Vice Letter (Lewis, William) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE Certificate of Notice by City of San Antonio, Texas (Lewis, William) |
| Filing 3 Letter to attorney Andrew Segovia regarding admission to the Western District of Texas. (bc) |
| Case assigned to Judge Xavier Rodriguez. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (bc) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad (bc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by City of San Antonio (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-11632720), filed by City of San Antonio. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Pleadings from County Court, #2 Exhibit A-Pleadings from County Court, #3 Exhibit A-Pleadings from County Court, #4 Exhibit A-Pleadings from County Court, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Supplement to JS 44)(Lewis, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
