Armstrong v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Michelle Nacole Armstrong |
| Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul |
| 5:2019cv01092 |
| September 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| David A Ezra |
| Richard B Farrer |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (mgr) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Michelle Nacole Armstrong. (Olinsky, Howard) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT, filed by Michelle Nacole Armstrong.(mgr) |
Filing 2
ORDER GRANTING #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Signed by Judge Richard B. Farrer. (mgr)
|
| Case assigned to Judge David A. Ezra. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (mgr) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Richard B. Farrer.. Referral Judge: Richard B. Farrer. (mgr) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michelle Nacole Armstrong. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Letter to Clerk, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Proposed Summons)(Olinsky, Howard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
