Pederson v. Unilever N.V., et al
| Janneth Pederson |
| Unilever United States, Inc., Unilever PLC, Unilever N.V. and Unilever United States Inc. |
| 5:2020cv00020 |
| January 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Xavier Rodriguez |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1391 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Unilever United States Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Stubbs, Jennise) |
Text Order GRANTING #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. The deadline is hereby extended to April 3, 2020. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (arb)
|
|
Text Order GRANTING #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Defendant's deadline to answer is extended to March 20, 2020. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (arb)
|
| Reset Deadlines: Unilever United States Inc. answer due 3/20/2020. (bc) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Unilever United States Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Stubbs, Jennise) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Janneth Pederson. Unilever United States Inc. served on 1/29/2020, answer due 2/19/2020. (Shokouhi, Arnold) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Unilever United States Inc.. (wg) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Janneth Pederson. (Bryan, Justin) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Order entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (arb)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Justin Neal Bryan for Evan M. Selik ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-13077314) by on behalf of Janneth Pederson. (Bryan, Justin) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Order entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (arb)
|
| Filing 4 Letter sent to attorney: Evan Selik regarding admission into the Western District of Texas (bc) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Justin Neal Bryan for Kristin M. Hecker ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-13055490) by on behalf of Janneth Pederson. (Bryan, Justin) |
| Case assigned to Judge Xavier Rodriguez. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (bc) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (bc) |
| Filing 2 JS44 (Civil Cover Sheet) submitted by Janneth Pederson. (Bryan, Justin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Original Class Action Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-13049420), filed by Janneth Pederson.(Bryan, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
