Klinge v. KBL Associates, LLC et al
| Brad Klinge |
| Kimberly Leatherwood and KBL Associates, LLC |
| 5:2020cv00470 |
| April 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Xavier Rodriguez |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM against Brad Klinge amending, filed by KBL Associates, LLC.(Jackson, Stephen) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by KBL Associates, LLC, re #11 MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaims filed by Plaintiff Brad Klinge (Jackson, Stephen) |
| Filing 17 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Brad Klinge. (Sanford, Josh) |
Filing 16
ORDER (Setting Status Conference Via Video Conference for 7/15/2020 10:30 AM before Judge Xavier Rodriguez). Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (rg)
|
|
Filing 15
SCHEDULING ORDER: Bench Trial set for 4/19/2021 10:30 AM before Judge Xavier Rodriguez, Pretrial Conference set for 4/8/2021 10:30 AM before Judge Xavier Rodriguez, ADR Report Deadline due by 11/20/2020, Amended Pleadings due by 7/10/2020, Discovery due by 12/18/2020, Joinder of Parties due by 7/10/2020, Dispositive Motions due by 1/22/2021. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (rg)
|
| Filing 14 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by KBL Associates, LLC. (Jackson, Stephen) |
| Filing 13 Scheduling Recommendations by KBL Associates, LLC, Kimberly Leatherwood. (Jackson, Stephen) |
| Filing 12 Rule 26(f) Discovery Report/Case Management Plan by KBL Associates, LLC, Kimberly Leatherwood. (Jackson, Stephen) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaims by Brad Klinge. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sanford, Josh) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE in Support, filed by Kimberly Leatherwood, re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Defendant Kimberly Leatherwood (Jackson, Stephen) |
| Filing 9 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Brad Klinge, re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Defendant Kimberly Leatherwood (Sanford, Josh) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER AND ADVISORY (Proposed Scheduling Order due by 6/10/2020) The parties are hereby ORDERED to notify the Court whether or not they consent toMagistrate Judge jurisdiction within thirty (30) days of the date of the filing of this Order. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (rg)
|
| Filing 7 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by KBL Associates, LLC. (Jackson, Stephen) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint . Attorney Stephen C. Jackson added to party KBL Associates, LLC(pty:dft) by KBL Associates, LLC.(Jackson, Stephen) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Kimberly Leatherwood. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Jackson, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brad Klinge. All Defendants. (Sanford, Josh) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to KBL Associates, LLC, Kimberly Leatherwood. (mgr) |
| Case assigned to Judge Xavier Rodriguez. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (mgr) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad (mgr) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Brad Klinge. for KBL Associates, LLC, and Kimberly Leatherwood (Sanford, Josh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-13460174), filed by Brad Klinge. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sanford, Josh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
