Todd v. Crown Equipment Corporation
Plaintiff: Herbert Todd
Defendant: Crown Equipment Corporation
Case Number: 5:2021cv00900
Filed: September 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Orlando L Garcia
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2021 Filing 9 Proposed Scheduling Order by Crown Equipment Corporation. (Kilpatrick, Peter)
November 5, 2021 Filing 8 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Crown Equipment Corporation. (Kilpatrick, Peter)
November 5, 2021 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: ***DOCUMENT DEFICIENT--PARTY NAMES NOT LISTED UNDER THE "PARTIES PRINTED NAMES" SECTION. PLEASE FILE A CORRECTED CONSENT TO INCLUDE THE PARTY NAMES*** re #7 Consent to Trial by US Magistrate Judge. (bc)
November 4, 2021 Filing 7 ***DOCUMENT DEFICIENT--PARTY NAMES NOT LISTED UNDER THE "PARTIES PRINTED NAMES" SECTION. PLEASE FILE A CORRECTED CONSENT TO INCLUDE THE PARTY NAMES*** CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Crown Equipment Corporation. (Kilpatrick, Peter) Modified on 11/5/2021 To edit text (bc).
October 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order for Scheduling Recommendations--The parties are to submit a proposed scheduling order for the Court's consideration within forty-five (45) days of the filing of this Order. Notice of right to consent to disposition of a civil case by a U.S. Magistrate Judge due by 11/5/2021. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (bc)
October 5, 2021 Filing 5 Pro Hac Vice Letter- Brian Metcalf. (bc)
October 4, 2021 Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Parties by Crown Equipment Corporation. (Kilpatrick, Peter)
September 22, 2021 Filing 3 Pro Hac Vice Letter- Michael L. Orth, Michael B. Mathis, Anissa Barrera, and Alexis A. Medina. (bc)
September 22, 2021 Filing 2 JS44 (Civil Cover Sheet) submitted by Crown Equipment Corporation. (Kilpatrick, Peter)
September 20, 2021 Case assigned to Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (bc)
September 20, 2021 If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (bc)
September 20, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Herbert Todd (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0542-15245293), filed by Herbert Todd. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - Original Petition, #3 Exhibit 2 - Citation, #4 Exhibit 3 - Affidavit, #5 Exhibit 4 - Original Answer, #6 Exhibit 5 - State Court Docket Sheet)(Kilpatrick, Peter)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Todd v. Crown Equipment Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Herbert Todd
Represented By: Catherine Tobin
Represented By: John B. Martinez
Represented By: Robert C. Hilliard
Represented By: Rudy Gonzales, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Crown Equipment Corporation
Represented By: Peter L. Kilpatrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?