Ferguson v. Texas Farm Bureau et al
| Christopher Ferguson |
| Farm Bureau County Mutual Insurance Company of Texas, Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company, Texas Farm Bureau, Texas Farm Bureau Business Corporation, Texas Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company and Texas Farm Bureau Underwriters |
| 6:2017cv00111 |
| April 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Waco Office |
| Jeffrey C. Manske |
| Robert Pitman |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
210
ORDER GRANTING 204 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (mc5)
|
|
Filing
136
ORDER GRANTING IN PART 129 Motion for Reconsideration. 79 MOTION to Strike 65 Brief, MOTION for Protective Order filed by Christopher Ferguson is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART filed by Christopher Ferguson. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (mc5)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 115 . Fergusons 13 Motion to Certify Class, filed by Christopher Ferguson is GRANTED. The Court FURTHER ORDERS as follows: The Court conditionally certifies the following class (Class) for purposes of providing notice to potential class members and allowing potential class members to opt in... Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (tb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
