The Cincinnati Indemnity Co. v. Davis Iron Works, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: The Cincinnati Indemnity Co.
Defendant: Davis Iron Works, Ltd., Brandon Rose and Davis Iron Works, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2019cv00040
Filed: February 7, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alan D Albright
Referring Judge: Jeffrey C Manske
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by The Cincinnati Indemnity Co.. Davis Iron Works, Ltd. served on 2/11/2019, answer due 3/4/2019. (Waltz, Donald)
March 25, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by The Cincinnati Indemnity Co.. Davis Iron Works, Inc. served on 2/11/2019, answer due 3/4/2019. (Waltz, Donald)
March 25, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by The Cincinnati Indemnity Co.. Brandon Rose served on 2/11/2019, answer due 3/4/2019. (Waltz, Donald)
February 8, 2019 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Brandon Rose. (tb)
February 8, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Davis Iron Works, Inc. (tb)
February 8, 2019 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Davis Iron Works, Ltd. (tb)
February 8, 2019 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by The Cincinnati Indemnity Co.. to Davis Iron Works, Ltd., Davis Iron Works, Inc. and Brandon Rose (Waltz, Donald)
February 7, 2019 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Parties by The Cincinnati Indemnity Co.. (Waltz, Donald)
February 7, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-11735671). No Summons requested at this time, filed by The Cincinnati Indemnity Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Waltz, Donald)
February 7, 2019 Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright and Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE., CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Alan D Albright and Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. (lad)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The Cincinnati Indemnity Co. v. Davis Iron Works, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Cincinnati Indemnity Co.
Represented By: Donald A. Waltz
Represented By: R. Ashley Veitenheimer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Davis Iron Works, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brandon Rose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Davis Iron Works, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?