Commstech LLC v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company et al
| Commstech LLC |
| Aruba Networks, Inc. and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company |
| 6:2019cv00462 |
| August 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Commstech LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Parekh, Aakash) |
| Reset Deadlines: Aruba Networks, Inc. and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company answer due 10/10/2019. (lad) |
Text Order GRANTING #14 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Came on for consideration is Plaintiff's Stipulation and Motion to extend the time for Defendants to Answer. The Court GRANTS the Motion. Defendants shall have up to and including October 10, 2019 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jy)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Commstech LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Parekh, Aakash) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Commstech LLC. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company served on 8/20/2019, answer due 9/10/2019. (Parekh, Aakash) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Commstech LLC. Aruba Networks, Inc. served on 8/20/2019, answer due 9/10/2019. (Parekh, Aakash) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. GRANTING #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (am)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Aakash S. Parekh for Jae Y. Pak ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-12472382) by on behalf of Commstech LLC. (Parekh, Aakash) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Aakash S. Parekh for Sean M. Sullivan ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-12472277) by on behalf of Commstech LLC. (Parekh, Aakash) |
| Filing 8 Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (am) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Aruba Networks, Inc. (lad) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. (lad) |
| Filing 5 Pro Hac Vice Letter to George I. Lee, Sean M. Sullivan, Michael P. Boyea, Cole B. Richter and Jae Y. Pak (lad) |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Commstech LLC. (Parekh, Aakash) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Commstech LLC. (Parekh, Aakash) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Commstech LLC. (Parekh, Aakash) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-12456427), filed by Commstech LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Parekh, Aakash) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
