ParkerVision, Inc. v. Hisense Co., Ltd. et al
Plaintiff: ParkerVision, Inc.
Defendant: Hisense Visual Technology Co., Ltd., Hisense Co., Ltd., Qingdao Hisense Electronics Co., LTD. and Hisense Electronic Co., LTD.
Case Number: 6:2020cv00870
Filed: September 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alan D Albright
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 19, 2020 Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ParkerVision, Inc.. Hisense Co., Ltd. served on 11/5/2020, answer due 11/26/2020. (Mort, Raymond)
November 19, 2020 Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ParkerVision, Inc.. Hisense Visual Technology Co., Ltd. served on 11/5/2020, answer due 11/26/2020. (Mort, Raymond)
October 30, 2020 Filing 13 Summons Issued as to Hisense Visual Technology Co., Ltd.. (am)
October 30, 2020 Filing 12 Summons Issued as to Hisense Co., Ltd.. (am)
October 30, 2020 Filing 11 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by ParkerVision, Inc.. (Mort, Raymond)
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #10 Motion entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Effect Alternative Service onDefendant Hisense Co., Ltd. and Defendant Hisense Visual Technology Co., Ltd. (F/K/A Qingdao Hisense Electronics Co., Ltd. and Hisense Electronics Co., LTD.) (Defendants). After considering Plaintiffs Motion and supporting evidence, the Court finds that Plaintiffs Motion should be GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff may serve Defendants via email upon its U.S. counsel Mr. Jordan Coyle, jcoyle@orrick.com; Mr. Christopher Higgins, chiggins@orrick.com; Mr. Robert Benson, rbenson@orrick.com; Jeffrey Johnson, jj@orrick.com; Xiang Wang, xiangwang@orrick.com and via a registered mail carrier with return receipt upon Defendants U.S. subsidiary Hisense USA Corporation locatedat 7310 McGinnis Ferry Road, Suite 100, Suwanee, GA 30024. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ep4)
October 26, 2020 Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Effect Alternate Service by ParkerVision, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Proposed Order)(Mort, Raymond)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Ronald M. Daignault for ParkerVision, Inc. Before the Court is the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds it should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mm6)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Stephanie R Mandir for ParkerVision, Inc. Before the Court is the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds it should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mm6)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Jason S. Charkow for ParkerVision, Inc. Before the Court is the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds it should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mm6)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Chandran B. Iyer for ParkerVision, Inc. Before the Court is the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds it should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mm6)
October 19, 2020 Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Raymond W Mort, III ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14086227) by on behalf of ParkerVision, Inc.. (Mort, Raymond)
October 19, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Raymond W Mort, III ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14086216) by on behalf of ParkerVision, Inc.. (Mort, Raymond)
October 19, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Raymond W Mort, III ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14086208) by on behalf of ParkerVision, Inc.. (Mort, Raymond)
October 19, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Raymond W Mort, III ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14086170) by on behalf of ParkerVision, Inc.. (Mort, Raymond)
September 25, 2020 Filing 4 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Ronald M. Daignault, Chandran Iyer, Jason Charkow and Stephanie Mandir. (lad)
September 24, 2020 Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad)
September 24, 2020 Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Mort, Raymond)
September 24, 2020 Filing 2 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by ParkerVision, Inc.. (Mort, Raymond)
September 24, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-14005142). No Summons requested at this time, filed by ParkerVision, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mort, Raymond)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ParkerVision, Inc. v. Hisense Co., Ltd. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ParkerVision, Inc.
Represented By: Raymond W Mort, III
Represented By: Jason S. Charkow
Represented By: Ronald M. Daignault
Represented By: Stephanie R Mandir
Represented By: Chandran B. Iyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hisense Visual Technology Co., Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hisense Co., Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Qingdao Hisense Electronics Co., LTD.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hisense Electronic Co., LTD.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?