Textile Computer Systems, Inc. v. Jefferson Bank
Textile Computer Systems, Inc. |
Jefferson Bank |
6:2022cv00933 |
September 12, 2022 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Alan D Albright |
Derek T Gilliland |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 NOTICE Defendant's Second Unopposed Notice of Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Jefferson Bank (Heidrick, Jay) |
Reset Deadlines: Jefferson Bank answer due 11/21/2022. (zv) |
Filing 16 NOTICE Defendant's Corrected Unopposed Notice of Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Jefferson Bank (Heidrick, Jay) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Catherine Bartles on behalf of Textile Computer Systems, Inc. (Bartles, Catherine) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Stafford Grigsby Helm Davis on behalf of Textile Computer Systems, Inc. (Davis, Stafford) |
Filing 13 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (lad) |
Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Jefferson Bank. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Derek T. Gilliland. (Heidrick, Jay) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jay E. Heidrick on behalf of Jefferson Bank. Attorney Jay E. Heidrick added to party Jefferson Bank(pty:dft) (Heidrick, Jay) |
Filing 10 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Textile Computer Systems, Inc.. (Antonelli, Matthew) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Textile Computer Systems, Inc.. Jefferson Bank served on 9/15/2022, answer due 10/6/2022. (Antonelli, Matthew) |
Parties shall comply with Judge Albright's updated #standing orders available by clicking the included hyperlinks. The updated orders are as follows:1. #Standing Order Governing Proceedings Patent Cases,2. #Amended Standing Order On Pretrial Procedures and Requirements in Civil Cases. (bot4) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Jefferson Bank. (zv) |
Filing 7 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Textile Computer Systems, Inc.. (Antonelli, Matthew) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by C. Ryan Pinckney on behalf of Textile Computer Systems, Inc. (Pinckney, C.) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Larry D. Thompson on behalf of Textile Computer Systems, Inc. (Thompson, Larry) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Zachariah Harrington on behalf of Textile Computer Systems, Inc. (Harrington, Zachariah) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Cases Pending in the Waco Division by Textile Computer Systems, Inc. (Antonelli, Matthew) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Antonelli, Matthew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-16509210). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Textile Computer Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Antonelli, Matthew) (Attachment 1 replaced on 9/12/2022) (lad). |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Derek T. Gilliland. (lad) |
Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad) |
All parties shall comply with the Standing Orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/.(lad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.